[MathSoc Council] Motions to be added to next council meeting
elizabethmcfaul2 at gmail.com
Thu Oct 10 16:47:31 EDT 2013
There's a good reason we don't force the President to start an election on
the first day. The first week is crazy, and trying to run nominations in it
can be challenging for a new exec team. There have also been cases where we
start a nomination process in the end of the previous term and runs through
the first couple of weeks. I agree with the idea of getting new councillors
early, but the gain is often only a single meeting (the budget meeting). An
alternative option would be choosing the CRO the term before, if the
timeline is essential.
On the Schulze STV side, I don't think we should change it. Part of the
uniqueness of math is that we are using the most? mathematically correct
system, and we do a full explanation of the results. Anyone can scrutinize
it if they have an understanding of graph theory. There are also open
source implementations that we can use to run it. On the Feds side, I'm
recommending a shift to BC STV only because Schulze is a huge change, and
there are additional IT challenges. Changing to a new system wouldn't solve
the succession problem either, since its the voting system that requires
training not the calculations portion.
We haven't had any complaints about it. Changing this seems like a waste of
time (and resources).
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Febrian Sidharta <febrian914 at gmail.com>wrote:
> President is CRO until a CRO is elected, but there is no obligation to run
> Why starting at first day of class? So that we can have newly elected
> councillors within the first 2-3 weeks, so they can join the second (if not
> the first) council meeting, instead of later in the term.
> As Stephane mentioned, Schulze STV is complicated. Right now we only have
> one (or two) people who can scrutinize it. It is a problem for succession
> and transparency.
> BC STV is proposed because i consider it to be the most fair system that
> is not too complicated to be understood by most people. I am open for
> feedback if there is another system that can be more fair yet easy to
> scrutinize and be understood.
> Febrian Sidharta
> On 2013-10-10 4:21 PM, "Elizabeth McFaul" <elizabethmcfaul2 at gmail.com>
>> We have been running under the assumption that the President is CRO until
>> one is elected, and have been running elections for empty seats at the
>> start of the term.
>> What's your reasoning behind simplifying to BC STV? I was under the
>> impression that we haven't had any issues running Schulze STV.
>> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Febrian Sidharta <fsidhart at uwaterloo.ca>wrote:
>>> To Speaker,
>>> I intend to propose two motions to change Elections Procedure policy in
>>> the next Mathsoc Council meeting (exact wording will follow)
>>> 1. in the terms when by-election is needed, to require President to run
>>> the by-election with nomination period start at the first day of school
>>> 2. to change election vote process from Schulze STV to BC STV
>>> *Febrian Sidharta*
>>> Statistics Councillor, Fall 2013
>>> Chief Returning Officer, Fall 2013
>>> Mathematics Society, University of Waterloo
>>> Council mailing list
>>> Council at mathsoc.uwaterloo.ca
>> *Elizabeth McFaul*
>> 4B Honours Mathematics/Business Administration Double Degree
>> University of Waterloo/Wilfrid Laurier University*
>> Email:* elizabethmcfaul2 at gmail.com*
>> Council mailing list
>> Council at mathsoc.uwaterloo.ca
> Council mailing list
> Council at mathsoc.uwaterloo.ca
4B Honours Mathematics/Business Administration Double Degree
University of Waterloo/Wilfrid Laurier University*
Email:* elizabethmcfaul2 at gmail.com*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Council